I bet Joan Didion’s college app essay to Stanford was pretty darn good. But it wasn’t enough to get her admitted to the Farm, as it’s known.
I’ve known this story for most of my adult life. Joan Didion, one of the most influential writers of the late twentieth century — who meant the world to young women writers like me when we discovered her — was rejected by Stanford and ended up at UC Berkeley. She was from a wealthy family in Sacramento, a true daughter of the West whose work was imbued with the influence of that landscape on her sensibility.
She wrote memorably about studying Hemingway at Berkeley, and in particular of typing out his work to learn its lessons for her own writing. When she died in December 2021, it was impossible to avoid reading tributes to her in every publication — and on every Facebook page — for several months.
But until a few minutes ago, when I read her essay on this matter, “On Being Unchosen By the College of One’s Choice,” recently collected in a new volume, I never knew anything more about her application to or rejection from Stanford.
As you read about her rejection in 1952 in the essay itself just below, I hope the takeaway is that college is what you make of it. And that being rejected by your “dream school” — whether it’s Stanford, MIT, UMich, or the University of Vermont — is one moment in your life. It may be a painful moment, shot through with self-doubt, but it’s not a judgment on who you are or what you’re capable of.
Didion published the essay in a magazine in 1968, having been inspired to look at her ancient rejection letter to soothe the nerves of a 17-year-old cousin “who is unable to eat or sleep as she waits to hear from what she keeps the calling the colleges of her choice.” When Joan got her letter, she writes, “I went upstairs to my room and locked the door and for a couple of hours I cried. For a while I sat on the floor of my closet and buried my face in an old quilted robe…”
She reports that in the fall, she went to a community college and made up the credits she needed to attend UC Berkeley. The following year, a friend at Stanford “asked me to write him a paper on [Joseph] Conrad’s Nostromo, and I did, and he got an A on it. I got a B- on the same paper at Berkeley,” and that helped her get over having been rejected.
“Of course it is harder to get into college now than it once was,” Didion writes in 1968….
For the essay in its entirety, here goes. And if you’re unfamiliar with the work of Joan Didion, you might want to start with her first book of essays, Slouching Towards Bethlehem. Her prose might give you some ideas about your own college app essay, or just make you want to keep reading her work.
“On Being Unchosen By the College of One’s Choice,”
This piece appeared in The Saturday Evening Post April 16, 1968.
“Dear Joan,” the letter begins, although the writer did not know me at all. The letter is dated April 25, 1952, and for a long time now it has been in a drawer in my mother’s house, the kind of back-bedroom drawer given over to class prophecies and dried butterfly orchids and newspaper photographs that show eight bridesmaids and two flower girls inspecting a sixpence in a bride’s shoe. What slight emotional investment I ever had in dried butterfly orchids and pictures of myself as a bridesmaid has proved evanescent, but I still have an investment in the letter, which, except for the “Dear Joan,” is mimeographed. I got the letter out as an object lesson for a 17-year-old cousin who is unable to eat or sleep as she waits to hear from what she keeps calling the colleges of her choice.
Here is what the letter says: “The Committee on Admissions asks me to inform you that it is unable to take favorable action upon your application for admission to Stanford University. While you have met the minimum requirements, we regret that because of the severity of the competition, the committee cannot include you in the group to be admitted. The Committee joins me in extending you every good wish for the successful continuation of your education. Sincerely yours, Rixford K. Snyder, Director of Admissions.”
I remember quite clearly the afternoon I opened that letter. I stood reading and re-reading it, my sweater and my books fallen on the hall floor, trying to interpret the words in some less final way, the phrases “unable to take” and “favorable action” fading in and out of focus until the sentence made no sense at all. We lived then in a big dark Victorian house, and I had a sharp and dolorous image of myself growing old in it, never going to school anywhere, the spinster in Washington Square. I went upstairs to my room and locked the door and for a couple of hours I cried.
For a while I sat on the floor of my closet and buried my face in an old quilted robe and later, after the situation’s real humiliations (all my friends who applied to Stanford had been admitted) had faded into safe theatrics, I sat on the edge of the bathtub and thought about swallowing the contents of an old bottle of codeine-and-Empirin. I saw myself in an oxygen tent, with Rixford K. Snyder hovering outside, although how the news was to reach Rixford K. Snyder was a plot point that troubled me even as I counted out the tablets.
Of course I did not take the tablets. I spent the rest of the spring in sullen but mild rebellion, sitting around drive-ins, listening to Tulsa evangelists on the car radio, and in the summer I fell in love with someone who wanted to be a golf pro, and I spent a lot of time watching him practice putting, and in the fall I went to a junior college a couple of hours a day and made up the credits I needed to go to the University of California at Berkeley. The next year a friend at Stanford asked me to write him a paper on Conrad’s Nostromo, and I did, and he got an A on it. I got a B- on the same paper at Berkeley, and the specter of Rixford K. Snyder was exorcised.
So it worked out all right, my single experience in that most conventional middle-class confrontation, the child vs. the Admissions Committee. But that was in the benign world of country California in 1952, and I think it must be more difficult for children I know now, children whose lives from the age of two or three are a series of perilously programmed steps, each of which must be successfully negotiated in order to avoid just such a letter as mine from one or another of the Rixford K. Snyders of the world.
An acquaintance told me recently that there were ninety applicants for the seven openings in the kindergarten of an expensive school in which she hoped to enroll her four-year-old, and that she was frantic because none of the four-year-old’s letters of recommendation had mentioned the child’s “interest in art.” Had I been raised under that pressure, I suspect, I would have taken the codeine-and-Empirin on that April afternoon in 1952. My rejection was different, my humiliation private: No parental hopes rode on whether I was admitted to Stanford, or anywhere. Of course my mother and father wanted me to be happy, and of course they expected that happiness would necessarily entail accomplishment, but the terms of that accomplishment were my affair.
Their idea of their own and of my worth remained independent of where, or even if, I went to college. Our social situation was static, and the question of “right” schools, so traditionally urgent to the upwardly mobile, did not arise. When my father was told that I had been rejected by Stanford, he shrugged and offered me a drink.
I think about that shrug with a great deal of appreciation whenever I hear parents talking about their children’s “chances.” What makes me uneasy is the sense that they are merging their children’s chances with their own, demanding of a child that he make good not only for himself but for the greater glory of his father and mother. Of course there are more children than “desirable” openings. But we are deluding ourselves if we pretend that desirable schools benefit the child alone. (“I wouldn’t care at all about his getting into Yale if it weren’t for Vietnam,” a father told me not long ago, quite unconscious of his own speciousness; it would have been malicious of me to suggest that one could also get a deferment at Long Beach State.)
Getting into college has become an ugly business, malignant in its consumption and diversion of time and energy and true interests, and not its least deleterious aspect is how the children themselves accept it. They talk casually and unattractively of their “first, second and third choices,” of how their “first-choice” application (to Stephens, say) does not actually reflect their first choice (their first choice was Smith, but their adviser said their chances were low, so why “waste” the application?); they are calculating about the expectation of rejections, about their “backup” possibilities, about getting the right sport and the right extracurricular activities to “balance” the application, about juggling confirmations when their third choice accepts before their first choices answers. They are wise in the white lie here, the small self-aggrandizement there, in the importance of letters from “names” their parents scarcely know. I have heard conversations among 16-year-olds who were exceeded in their skill at manipulative self-promotion only by applicants for large literary grants.
And of course none of it matters very much at all, none of these early successes, early failures. I wonder if we had better not find some way to let our children know this, some way to extricate our expectations from theirs, some way to let them work through their own rejections and sullen rebellions and interludes with golf pros, unassisted by anxious prompting from the wings. Finding one’s role at 17 is problem enough, without being handed somebody else’s script. END DIDION….
The college application and the college app essay have changed since Didion applied back in the 20th century. For 21st century guidance, please explore my website. You might like articles on why the college admissions essay prompts are your friends right here, and why I love these particular prompts right here, or the University of Chicago’s ultra-quirky supplements right here. And if you need help choosing a college, I’ve got a few ideas right here.
To find out more about what I can do for you and your college application essay, Please click here. To learn more about my values as a college admissions essay coach, please click here.
If you’re still investigating where to apply to college, I’ve got a few ideas right here.
Drop me an email or pick up the phone (East Coast time). And search through my website for tips on writing and applying in 2022.